Scintillating! A real page turner! I was at the edge of my seat! Not quite. But interesting, engaging and well versed and argued; yes.
“Is Jesus the Only Savior?” by Robert H. Nash has been thus far, a good read. Nash’s treatment of Christian Exclusionism, and Pluralism ala John Hick and other liberal notables has been well thought out and presented. It is obvious from Nash’s writing that he approaches these subjects from a Christian Orthodox worldview and therefore presents his viewpoints within the line of his refutations , which is quite expected as it seems he is out to discredit Hick’s arguments, which attempt to discredit Christian Orthodoxy.
Nash takes a sound approach to his arguments in presenting Hick’s stand first, his arguments then takes this stand and uses biblical and recognized scholarly citations to back up his arguments against Hick’s points; he does this quite well in my opinion. The fact that Hick and his liberal cronies haven’t got a logical argument as the foundation for all of their theology (or lack thereof) comes through most glaringly.
Nash has an easy writing style and language that is easily understood, even for the layperson. He presents his theology in a manner that is accessible to the reader. I especially enjoyed his use of tongue and cheek humor on occasion to make a point lightly.
In a scholarly sense, Nash first presents a complete overview of his thesis, laying out the groundwork for what lies ahead, namely his defense of Christian Exclusionism against the tide of politically correct brands of theology and why Christian Exclusionism needs defending. Nash’s explanations of all of the key terms in the first chapter help the reader in knowing why it is important to know the information he is offering.
Once Nash had established his thesis point and explained its importance, he went on using well founded points to build the foundation for his arguments. Nash’s use of citations was well done in both quality and quantity. The scholars’ works that Nash used were by scholars recognized and knowledgeable in their fields. He uses these citations as a good contrast when showing the pluralist arguments as weak and lacking substantial scholarly research.
One of my favorite parts of this reading was Nash’s use of “the excluded middle.” Being a fan of logic myself, I enjoyed Nash’s use of this concept to bore a hole straight through the pluralist point of view. It is incorrect to think that two diametrically opposed points of view can be simultaneously correct. Nash also did a good job in covering the importance of a proposition in his logic argument and showing how the pluralist has no leg on which to stand, since they seem to think that you can have two simultaneous propositions which are opposite, yet correct.
Overall, I have enjoyed my reading of Nash’s book and am anticipative of reading the second half on inclusivism; if he does as well with those arguments as he has done with pluralism, I think I will have yet more ammunition for my apologetics war chest.
Personal Conclusion
I enjoyed reading Nash’s book: “Is Jesus the Only Savior?” As a pastor, beginning bible scholar and one who is proceeding on in my studies in Evangelism and Church Planting, I feel it very important to be armed with as many apologetics and scholarly treatises backing up those apologetics as possible. I feel this book was such a factor as to give me those additional weapons.
The pluralists are rampant among the self professed intellectuals and academics. This feel-good, “I’m okay/you’re” okay approach to theology is dangerous. While it might feel good on the surface to mix and match theologies across a wide spectrum, which is today’s trend, it is spiritually dangerous. People ARE inventing a god in THEIR image, not that of the Holy Bible. There is an old saying, “if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything” which is much the case today. I know of professed Christians who do Yoga, speak of Karma and many more especially eastern theologies, all while saying that they are Christians.
Ronald H. Nash, author of: “Is Jesus the Only Savior?” stated the case against pluralism well when he wrote: “Pluralism is one of the three or four most serious threats to the integrity of the Christian faith and the end of the twentieth century. When people adopt pluralism, they must abandon every core doctrine of the Christian faith, including the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the Incarnation and the Atonement.” [1] (Nash 1994)
I believe Pluralism is one of the most insidious attractions that the enemy has come up with to date. The belief that “we’re all on different paths to the same outcome” is just one more way for Satan to not only water down Christianity, but to make it a non-entity altogether. To say that the pluralist is on a path is correct, the problem is; the path leads straight to Hell. In his gospel, John quoted Jesus as saying “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)[2] (John n.d.)That verse says it all for the Christian, you can’t mix and match, you either believe in Christ or you are not a Christian.
[1] Is Jesus the Only Savior? By Ronald H. Nash, 1994, pg 10
[2] John 14:6, Holy Bible, New International Version